Internal meetings in an anarchist group
One thing central to any functional anarchist group is regular
internal meetings. In a healthy organisation almost all decisions
will be made at these meetings and there will be a sufficient level
of discussion to ensure all those attending have a good idea of the
activity and arguments in the different struggles the organisation is
involved in. Internal meetings should also have some time given over
to education.
Frequency and location
A new group or one engaged in a lot of activity should meet at
least once a week, at the same time and day. As soon as possible
you should try and find a regular venue for meeting that is not
someone's home. You'll want a space that's private enough for you to
have strong disagreements in and where only the members of the group
will be while you are using it. In Ireland this means most groups
use private rooms in quiet pubs that are glad for the additional
customers on quiet nights!
Decision making
Arguments about how best to reach decisions are fundamental to
anarchism. What I have found works best is to allow plenty of time
for discussion in the hope of being able to reach a consensus. Only
when it becomes obvious that this is not possible should you move to
a vote. If time permits it may make sense to postpone making a
contentious decision to the next meeting to give people a chance to
think things over (and calm down!).
Conduct of discussion
Even with a small group its normally a very good idea to have
someone to chair the meeting. Being able to chair a meeting well is
quite difficult , in particular you need to be very careful not to
abuse your position in a strong argument. But its also important
that the same person does not chair every meeting. Perhaps the best
way is to have a list of everyone willing to chair and each week take
the next person on the list.
Basically a chair should
- try and arrange the room so that everyone sits in a circle and
make sure you are seated where you can see everyone
- if there are new people there start off by going around the
circle and getting everyone to say their name
- at the start of the meeting ask people for items for an agenda
and then stick to that agenda. If people start speaking on topics
rather then the one under discussion interrupt them politely and
tell them you are adding that item to the agenda
- ensure everyone has an equal opportunity to speak
- generally it's a good idea to ask people to put up their
hand when they want to speak and then to take a list of people
waiting. In most situations its a very good idea to put people
who have not yet spoken to the top of this que.
- if the discussion is just taking place between a few people
and in particular if it is just between two it is often a good
idea to suggest going around the circle and giving everyone a
chance to speak
- pay attention - people who are less confident about
speaking will often indicate that they want to speak in minor
way (eg briefly half put up their hand). A good chair will
spot this and encourage them to speak
- control yourself - while the chair can speak in debates you
should try and speak the least and always put yourself
at the end of the que. There is nothing worse then a chair who
feels they are entitled to comment after every single speaker.
Be very strict with yourself
- don't allow people speaking to insult other people in the
room. If they do interrupt and make it clear that this is not
acceptable
- if the discussion is going around in circles with the same
people making the same points again and again you should point
this out and ask if people want to continue the discussion or
1) Move to a vote
2) Postpone the discussion to later in the meeting or the next
meeting
if there is any disagreement on what to do you should call an
immediate hand vote on whether or not to continue the discussion
and then on what to do with the discussion.
- if it appears a decision has been reached (ie everyone is
agreeing) then write down what you think the decision is then read
this back to the meeting.
- if it appears a vote is necessary then make sure the exact
question to be voted on is written down and then read this
question back to the meeting before taking the vote. This is very
important in case there is later disagreement over what exactly
was decided.
Agenda
If its know who is chairing the meeting in advance it may be a
good idea for that person to start the meeting with a suggested
agenda. In any case the agenda should almost always include
- minutes of last meeting
- correspondence to be dealt with
- decisions that have to be made
- other issues people want discussed
- AOB at the end for minor things people want to mention or
things they have 'just remembered'
If there is any disagreement over the order of the agenda then
this should be quickly discussed and voted on at the start of the
meeting. If the chair thinks there is a lot to get through it may
make sense to set a maximum amount of time that can be spent
discussing particular topics right at the start of the meeting.
Minutes
Someone should be responsible every week for keeping minutes of
the meeting and preparing these to be read at or distributed before
the next meeting. Minutes need not be very detailed (you don't need
to write down what everyone says). They should include
- a list of who attended the meeting
- a list of topics discussed
- a list of decisions reached for each topic, this should be a
copy of what the chair reads out
- a list of who has volunteered to do what
- a list of items to be discussed at the next meeting
Further comments
It is important that meetings start on time and end before or at
the time they are advertised to end at. Certainly they should end
once they have reached the advertised time and somebody needs to
leave.